Skip to main content

A Catastrophe in Modern India.


However we live in a world where gigantic scientific and phenomenal technological achievements commands our administration, we are witnessing an intolerable degradation of man.

However India’s National policy for children says, “The Nation's Childrens are a Supremely Important Asset. Their Nurture and Solicitude are our responsibility. Children’s Programmes should find a prominent place in our National plans, for the Development of Human Resources, so that our Childrens grow up to become Robust Citizens, Physically fit, Mentally alert and Morally healthy, endowed with the Skills and Motivations needed by Society”, Yet the reality is cruelly hollow.

A continuous source of guilt, shame, annoyance to witness Childrens begging for alms at every other corner of traffic signals, railway stations, at places of worship; Infants sleeping, playing on the Footpath, roofless and rootless exposed to extreme heat, cold, Rains and hazards of worst Vehicular Pollution. Foreign tourists laugh and take photographs. Violence on streets has become order of the day.

Sometimes it appears nothing short of a miracle how these tiny tots survive amidst so manifestly apparent life threatening conditions.

Gross anomalies in societal front has penetrated to the extent of anomalies ceased to be considered anomaly.

The princely lives of our Constitutional functionaries gives an idea that India has overcome all ills and poverty been consigned to history.

We are Guilty of many errors and many faults, but our worst crime is abandoning the Childrens, neglecting their foundations of Life.

The Hon Courts have time and again voiced their deep concern & has passed orders and given directions only to be put in cold storage by the Govts while maintaining that they are seized of the matter.

Some of the landmark Judgments for profound welfare of childrens include :
M C Mehta Vs State of Tamilnadu [(1996) 6 SCC 756; 1997 SCC 49]
N Bhageerathan Vs State [1999 Cr LJ 632(Mad)]
Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs Union Of India [(1997) 10 SCC 549]
Mohini Jain Vs State Of Karnataka [(1992) 3 SCC 66]
Unni Krishnan Vs State of A.P. [(1993) 1 SCC 645]
Vishal Jeet Vs Union of India[(1990) 3 SCC 318;1990 SCC (Cri) 543]

May I request this Constitutional functionary of my country to have a joint inspection of streets of their jurisdiction area and apprise themselves to the living conditions of our childrens?

Yet passing of Orders is not sufficed and the Judges must ensure that their Orders are complied with. What is the use if Orders passed are not implemented? The Govts may be directed to update its Website about Directions of the Court so given and action taken in pursuant thereof.

Merely throwing more money in annual Budget and enacting laws will not solve problem.

Accountability of every Public Official is a prerequisite.

In a Democracy some discipline has to be maintained about mans’ dignity.

This write up is proposed to sent to all the Constitutional Functionaries of India comprising Parliamentarians, Chief Ministers, Chief Justices, Prime Minister Mr. Manmohan Singh and to the President of India Smt. Pratibha Patil; and the writer is curiously looking for men of Wisdom who refuses to tolerate this human indignity.

Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.

Sandeep Jalan

Advocate

Law Referencer: https://www.litigationplatform.com/


Thank you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Commercial Courts / Suits - Pleadings and Procedure

The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015 – A broad framework In order to ensure speedy disposal of disputes which arises from commercial transactions involving high value, the Parliament of India has come out with a unique legislation namely, The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015; wherein Commercial Courts / Divisions are to be constituted in the existing district Courts and in High Courts; and wherein disputes arising from specified commercial dealings involving claim of Rs.1.00 Crore or above would be adjudicated by these newly constituted commercial Courts / Divisions. By virtue of recent Amendments, the limit of Rs.1.00 crore has been reduced to Rs.3.00 Lakhs; and accordingly claims relating to commercial disputes involving Rs.3.00 Lakhs could now be maintainable under this special regime.  And accordingly, the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is substantially amended, wherein new Order XIII-A and XV-A are inserted, apart from new Order XI, Sections 35 for costs, Verification of ...

Leading Evidence during trial

1.       In case where the accused refused to plead guilty of the offence to which he is charged with, and claims to be tried, the Court calls upon the Prosecution / Complainant to lead all the evidences he has in support of his case. 2.       In criminal trial, the evidence are required to be led by the complainant and / or their witnesses by stepping into the witness box and illustrating / demonstrating to what they have witnessed. The Complainant is to examine before the Court, himself, and all other witnesses, who are “witness” to the crime, which is alleged to have been committed by the accused named in the complaint. This examination of himself and other prosecution witnesses is called “Examination – in – Chief. 3.       Giving evidence of facts is critical to any trial, be it civil trial or criminal trial. And therefore, it becomes imperative to understand the dynamics of evidence in legal sens...

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...