Skip to main content

A Catastrophe in Modern India.


However we live in a world where gigantic scientific and phenomenal technological achievements commands our administration, we are witnessing an intolerable degradation of man.

However India’s National policy for children says, “The Nation's Childrens are a Supremely Important Asset. Their Nurture and Solicitude are our responsibility. Children’s Programmes should find a prominent place in our National plans, for the Development of Human Resources, so that our Childrens grow up to become Robust Citizens, Physically fit, Mentally alert and Morally healthy, endowed with the Skills and Motivations needed by Society”, Yet the reality is cruelly hollow.

A continuous source of guilt, shame, annoyance to witness Childrens begging for alms at every other corner of traffic signals, railway stations, at places of worship; Infants sleeping, playing on the Footpath, roofless and rootless exposed to extreme heat, cold, Rains and hazards of worst Vehicular Pollution. Foreign tourists laugh and take photographs. Violence on streets has become order of the day.

Sometimes it appears nothing short of a miracle how these tiny tots survive amidst so manifestly apparent life threatening conditions.

Gross anomalies in societal front has penetrated to the extent of anomalies ceased to be considered anomaly.

The princely lives of our Constitutional functionaries gives an idea that India has overcome all ills and poverty been consigned to history.

We are Guilty of many errors and many faults, but our worst crime is abandoning the Childrens, neglecting their foundations of Life.

The Hon Courts have time and again voiced their deep concern & has passed orders and given directions only to be put in cold storage by the Govts while maintaining that they are seized of the matter.

Some of the landmark Judgments for profound welfare of childrens include :
M C Mehta Vs State of Tamilnadu [(1996) 6 SCC 756; 1997 SCC 49]
N Bhageerathan Vs State [1999 Cr LJ 632(Mad)]
Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs Union Of India [(1997) 10 SCC 549]
Mohini Jain Vs State Of Karnataka [(1992) 3 SCC 66]
Unni Krishnan Vs State of A.P. [(1993) 1 SCC 645]
Vishal Jeet Vs Union of India[(1990) 3 SCC 318;1990 SCC (Cri) 543]

May I request this Constitutional functionary of my country to have a joint inspection of streets of their jurisdiction area and apprise themselves to the living conditions of our childrens?

Yet passing of Orders is not sufficed and the Judges must ensure that their Orders are complied with. What is the use if Orders passed are not implemented? The Govts may be directed to update its Website about Directions of the Court so given and action taken in pursuant thereof.

Merely throwing more money in annual Budget and enacting laws will not solve problem.

Accountability of every Public Official is a prerequisite.

In a Democracy some discipline has to be maintained about mans’ dignity.

This write up is proposed to sent to all the Constitutional Functionaries of India comprising Parliamentarians, Chief Ministers, Chief Justices, Prime Minister Mr. Manmohan Singh and to the President of India Smt. Pratibha Patil; and the writer is curiously looking for men of Wisdom who refuses to tolerate this human indignity.

Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.

Sandeep Jalan

Advocate

Law Referencer: https://www.litigationplatform.com/


Thank you.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Recall Jurisdiction of the Courts

What is Recall of Orders of the Court ? But first….what is expected from the Orders of the Court – a)       While giving due consideration to the submissions and evidences on record of the rival parties, to record a reasoned finding with respect to disputed question of fact or of law; b)       Employing cogent reasons about the conclusion reached in the order / judgment. c)       Passing of orders in accordance with law. d)      Principles of natural justice are reasonably observed in the judicial proceeding. And when the Orders suffers from any of the vices, it is challenged by way of Review, Appeal or in Revision, alleging the impugned Order, being infected with either of the grounds, i.e. – a)       That there is Error apparent on the face of the Record; b)       That there is Perversity in the impugned Order; c)...
8 comments
Read more

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mumbai Capital Value Property Tax Judgment: A Rocket Science by Social Scientists; A Brief Analysis;

The subject of taxation is a “Rocket Science”. The constitution of Nine Judges Bench in the Mafatlal Industries Case, Reported in (1997) 5 SCC 536, running into more than 500 pages; the extremely contested Vodafone litigation; and the present Judgment of Bombay High Court running into 310 Pages, at least furnishes some justification to this statement of Rocket Science. There are umpteen Judgments, some of which are relied herein also (Para 147), that whilst dealing with challenge to Taxation laws, greater latitude is shown by Constitutional Courts, only for the reason that Taxation / Economic Legislation, by their very nature, are very complex. And hold on, the Regime of Property Tax based on Capital Value of the Property, was brought in force, on the recommendations of Tata Institute of “Social Sciences”. (Para 33 of the Judgment) Did these Social Scientist, nevertheless very respectable, would appreciate an Inch of what was discussed in 310 Pages of Judgment, even assuming t...
4 comments
Read more