Skip to main content

They must be told what they are in effect doing or saying...


Gross negligence and corrupt act of ministers and commissioners often draw flak, strictures, severe criticism from higher courts and equally some time comes from highest constitutional office of prime minister and home minister. Higher Courts and these higher Constitutional functionaries but must be told- What in effect they are saying, or in effect what they are doing.

So in effect these higher Courts and these Constitutional people give FRIENDLY WARNINGS for Serious lapses and definite guilt.

In the latest of these series, Shri Chidambaram, the Home Minister, on occasion of 1st annivarsary of 26/11 attack on mumbai, the senior and learned most, severely criticised mumbai police for they “misplaced bullet proof jackets and important files pertaining to purchase of these bullet proof jackets”, those bullet proof jackets which didnt worked and caused loss of our three most brilliant upright Police Officers. Those three Police Officers are Hemant Karkare, Vijay Salaskar and Ashok Kamte. They must be told what they are in effect saying.

This term FRIENDLY WARNING is coined by LORD DENNING, one of the most celebrated Judge of House of Lords, England of 1950/60/70.

Also, recently, Bombay High Court Judge J N Patel is found (false) lamenting to say- Wear these bullet proof jackets to work, Mr cm. News Report- 11.12.2009- bottom of page 1.

Judges- may please refrain from passing remarks because you claim to be less humans and more infallible and because these remarks tend to make cheap and trivial the gross anomaly you are dealing with.

Please dont waste time in passing comments and strictures against passionate negligent state men.

Please pass orders that help in avoidance of repetition of issue they you are dealing with.

Judges- Please remember again - you claim to be less humans and more infallibles. therefore you shouldn’t be doing what every men is doing.

--
--
iN APPRECIATION,
Sandeep Jalan

Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.

Law Referencer: https://www.litigationplatform.com/


Thank you.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leading Evidence during trial

1.       In case where the accused refused to plead guilty of the offence to which he is charged with, and claims to be tried, the Court calls upon the Prosecution / Complainant to lead all the evidences he has in support of his case. 2.       In criminal trial, the evidence are required to be led by the complainant and / or their witnesses by stepping into the witness box and illustrating / demonstrating to what they have witnessed. The Complainant is to examine before the Court, himself, and all other witnesses, who are “witness” to the crime, which is alleged to have been committed by the accused named in the complaint. This examination of himself and other prosecution witnesses is called “Examination – in – Chief. 3.       Giving evidence of facts is critical to any trial, be it civil trial or criminal trial. And therefore, it becomes imperative to understand the dynamics of evidence in legal sens...
1 comment
Read more

FORM I [See Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3)]

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM I Under Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3) Encroach upon the Legislative Policy of the Parliament. FORM I [See Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3)] Domestic Incident Report under Sections 9(b) and 37(2)(c) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005) 1. Details of the complainant/aggrieved person     (1) Name of the complainant/aggrieved person:     (2) Age:     (3) Address of the shared household:     (4) Present Address:     (5) Phone Number, if any: 2. Details of Respondents: Sl. No. Name Relationship with the aggrieved person Address Telephone No., if any 3. Details of children, if any, of the aggrieved person:         (a) Number of Children:    ...
Post a Comment
Read more