Skip to main content

A reasonable case to get away from PIL syndrome..

It is the same as JUDGES while themselves protected with tough woodland shoes & then with great enthusiasm VENTURE to adjudicate rights of humanity, in continuous deprivation, suffering BAREFOOT on path scattered with broken glasses.

As long as judges, AT LEAST, imagine removing their tough shoes and imagine exposing themselves to the hazard of walking barefoot on path of broken glasses, they can hardly imagine the pain, then is felt when the particle of broken glass penetrate to the legroom and the consequent red fluid slowly come from there.

Therefore, when the pain of this suffering humanity is not properly imagined, Judges think that they are at liberty to arrive that NO rights of theirs are violated. Status quo can be maintained.

Moreover, sometime I wonder, when all the cases of suffering humanity are filed in representative capacity i.e. in the form of PILs, wherein the actual victim is not present arguing before the court for his fundamental & Statutory dues, the real pain on the face of victim is bound to be missing on the face of Counsel who is arguing for the victims. Again, Judges find themselves in better position to arrive that NO rights of theirs are violated. Status quo can be maintained.

I don’t think, if any court in the whole world, has enough courage to refuse a due relief to a women, ARGUING HERSELF before the court, when she is subject to everyday humiliation, when she is to defecate in the open public eye, when the men at administration take various defense for their failing to supply enough public toilets, a very basic need of life.

I don’t think, if any court in the whole world, has enough courage to refuse a due relief to a Child who is to beg for survival when the sovereign governments has promised dignity of life to him. But then the begging Child must be present in the court asking for relief because the Counsel is incapable of shedding tears which the begging child will.

It appears- HUMANS ARE ILL-EQUIPPED TO “ REALL KNOW / IMAGINE ” TO WHAT HE HAS NOT LIVED.

The above proposition come to my mind while I was reading a mail of- Affidavit filed by Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan in persuant to criminal contempt petition filed against him for his "objectionable statements" against the sitting SC Judge Mr kapadia. The Affidavit, among other things, highlighted how the SC has systematically sidelined the Petitioner's Counsel and appointed Amicus Curiae. The Amicus Curiae who happens to be the senior and the most expensive counsel of our time, took the case of the same party against whom he has to assist the court and he appointed his junior to play the role of amicus curiae. Then the SC went on to blatantly refuse the reliefs due to the petititoners. More shockingly, it is this Amicus curiae, the senior and most expensive counsel, has filed this criminal contempt petition.
http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?263230

iN APPRECIATION,
Sandeep Jalan

Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.

Law Referencer: https://www.litigationplatform.com/


Thank you.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Commercial Courts / Suits - Pleadings and Procedure

The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015 – A broad framework In order to ensure speedy disposal of disputes which arises from commercial transactions involving high value, the Parliament of India has come out with a unique legislation namely, The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015; wherein Commercial Courts / Divisions are to be constituted in the existing district Courts and in High Courts; and wherein disputes arising from specified commercial dealings involving claim of Rs.1.00 Crore or above would be adjudicated by these newly constituted commercial Courts / Divisions. By virtue of recent Amendments, the limit of Rs.1.00 crore has been reduced to Rs.3.00 Lakhs; and accordingly claims relating to commercial disputes involving Rs.3.00 Lakhs could now be maintainable under this special regime.  And accordingly, the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is substantially amended, wherein new Order XIII-A and XV-A are inserted, apart from new Order XI, Sections 35 for costs, Verification of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leading Evidence during trial

1.       In case where the accused refused to plead guilty of the offence to which he is charged with, and claims to be tried, the Court calls upon the Prosecution / Complainant to lead all the evidences he has in support of his case. 2.       In criminal trial, the evidence are required to be led by the complainant and / or their witnesses by stepping into the witness box and illustrating / demonstrating to what they have witnessed. The Complainant is to examine before the Court, himself, and all other witnesses, who are “witness” to the crime, which is alleged to have been committed by the accused named in the complaint. This examination of himself and other prosecution witnesses is called “Examination – in – Chief. 3.       Giving evidence of facts is critical to any trial, be it civil trial or criminal trial. And therefore, it becomes imperative to understand the dynamics of evidence in legal sens...
1 comment
Read more

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more