Skip to main content

Bail matters are inherently different from other Legal Cases

 It is said that Bail is Rule and Jail is an exception in Bail Cases.

In a Society, which we do call it civilized, a Jail reduces a human being to animal. Jailing is akin to chaining human, where inherent human dignity is imminently lost. 

A Justice, Judge or a Magistrate, being a reflection of superior human being, must deemed to stand for personal liberty, and can never argue for chaining a fellow human, unless it is vehemently shown that fellow human has acquired an Animal instinct of grave danger. 

Therefore, in Bail matters, where limited issue is of personal liberty, a Judge indisputably stands for personal liberty.

Therefore, Bail matters are inherently different from other Legal Cases. In other Legal Cases, the Judges, dispassionately, may be deciding rights of the parties. But in Bail matters, Judges stand for Personal liberty; and therefore in Bail Cases, Judges have to “argue” passionately, Impugning Prosecution, in favour of personal liberty, unless animal instinct is shown. 

 

Regards,

Sandeep Jalan

Advocate

https://www.litigationplatform.com/

 

A passing thought:

Personal Liberty is not a Right, it is ours breathe, and breathe cannot be taken away frivolously.

A human person must be chained if he has acquired an Animal instinct and inevitably threatens the safety and peace of the Society. But not otherwise. This should only be the parameter or the benchmark for granting or refusing Bail.

 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leading Evidence during trial

1.       In case where the accused refused to plead guilty of the offence to which he is charged with, and claims to be tried, the Court calls upon the Prosecution / Complainant to lead all the evidences he has in support of his case. 2.       In criminal trial, the evidence are required to be led by the complainant and / or their witnesses by stepping into the witness box and illustrating / demonstrating to what they have witnessed. The Complainant is to examine before the Court, himself, and all other witnesses, who are “witness” to the crime, which is alleged to have been committed by the accused named in the complaint. This examination of himself and other prosecution witnesses is called “Examination – in – Chief. 3.       Giving evidence of facts is critical to any trial, be it civil trial or criminal trial. And therefore, it becomes imperative to understand the dynamics of evidence in legal sens...
1 comment
Read more

FORM I [See Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3)]

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM I Under Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3) Encroach upon the Legislative Policy of the Parliament. FORM I [See Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3)] Domestic Incident Report under Sections 9(b) and 37(2)(c) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005) 1. Details of the complainant/aggrieved person     (1) Name of the complainant/aggrieved person:     (2) Age:     (3) Address of the shared household:     (4) Present Address:     (5) Phone Number, if any: 2. Details of Respondents: Sl. No. Name Relationship with the aggrieved person Address Telephone No., if any 3. Details of children, if any, of the aggrieved person:         (a) Number of Children:    ...
Post a Comment
Read more