Skip to main content

Conveyance to Societies / Housing Societies


Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963, (MOFA) r/w Rule 9 of MOFA Rules, 1964, obligates upon Developers to execute conveyance in favour of the Society within four months from the date on which the co-operative Society is duly constituted.

The Conveyance to Housing Societies and other Societies, is a pressing issue in Mumbai; and rest of India may not be an exception. The Developers do not Convey land to in favour of Societies to retain control over the administration of the Building; and probably to claim further development rights over the said land, which may accrue in future.

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the Case of Ratna Rupal CHS [2011 (5) BCR 561, also referred in 2015 (5) MhLJ 318, 2016 (5) MhLJ 102] have made some very interesting observations:

Para 10: The Conveyance had to be executed within the specified period. The conveyance was not executed for a number of years. The Plaintiff (Society) must be taken to have had full title in the entire plot of land on which their building came to be constructed.

Para 27: Further, the failure and neglect to register the society and convey the property would certainly not give any right to the Developer to step upon the property or to claim any FSI. The FSI belongs to the plot. The plot must be taken to be conveyed after the statutory period.

The legal inference which can be drawn from the aforesaid observation is that – the Society is deemed to be the Owner of the subject land and only formal transfer / Conveyance is required.

Nevertheless, the issue remains as what legal remedy is available if the Developer neglects to execute Conveyance.

The remedy of deemed Conveyance is already on the table; but it appears to have not redressed the issue as thought of. The remedy of Consumer Court also failed to its expectation. The remedy before Civil Court by way of Civil Suit is always available.

I am of the view that remedy before Civil Court by way of Civil Suit may be effective, seeking Mandatory Injunction to Execute Document of Conveyance. It may be effective and economical for the following reasons –

Since it is a Statutory obligation, there will not be any Court fee on this Relief of Mandatory Injunction.

This relief of Mandatory Injunction may also be sought by way of Interim Relief, during the pendency of Suit.

If despite the Decree which may be passed at the Interim stage, the Developer neglects to Execute Conveyance, then, apart from other legal recourse that are available, by virtue of and in accordance with Order XXI, Rules 34 and 80 of CPC, 1908, the Document of Conveyance may be Executed and Registered by the Officer of the Court.
Nevertheless, the other Reliefs of damages, declaration, prohibitive Injunction, if any, may also be sought alongwith Mandatory Injunction.


I am of certain view that once the Society is duly constituted, the Developer would not have any sustainable plea, to resist Execution of Conveyance, more particularly for the reasons, the MOFA doesn’t stipulate any such condition.

Sandeep Jalan
Advocate

https://www.litigationplatform.com/




Labels:

Comments

Dr. Binoy Gupa x Chief Commissioner of Income Tax said…
Very good article giving the correct legal position.
October 2, 2022 at 7:58 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Recall Jurisdiction of the Courts

What is Recall of Orders of the Court ? But first….what is expected from the Orders of the Court – a)       While giving due consideration to the submissions and evidences on record of the rival parties, to record a reasoned finding with respect to disputed question of fact or of law; b)       Employing cogent reasons about the conclusion reached in the order / judgment. c)       Passing of orders in accordance with law. d)      Principles of natural justice are reasonably observed in the judicial proceeding. And when the Orders suffers from any of the vices, it is challenged by way of Review, Appeal or in Revision, alleging the impugned Order, being infected with either of the grounds, i.e. – a)       That there is Error apparent on the face of the Record; b)       That there is Perversity in the impugned Order; c)...
8 comments
Read more

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mumbai Capital Value Property Tax Judgment: A Rocket Science by Social Scientists; A Brief Analysis;

The subject of taxation is a “Rocket Science”. The constitution of Nine Judges Bench in the Mafatlal Industries Case, Reported in (1997) 5 SCC 536, running into more than 500 pages; the extremely contested Vodafone litigation; and the present Judgment of Bombay High Court running into 310 Pages, at least furnishes some justification to this statement of Rocket Science. There are umpteen Judgments, some of which are relied herein also (Para 147), that whilst dealing with challenge to Taxation laws, greater latitude is shown by Constitutional Courts, only for the reason that Taxation / Economic Legislation, by their very nature, are very complex. And hold on, the Regime of Property Tax based on Capital Value of the Property, was brought in force, on the recommendations of Tata Institute of “Social Sciences”. (Para 33 of the Judgment) Did these Social Scientist, nevertheless very respectable, would appreciate an Inch of what was discussed in 310 Pages of Judgment, even assuming t...
4 comments
Read more