Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership of
Flats Act, 1963, (MOFA) r/w Rule 9 of MOFA Rules, 1964, obligates upon
Developers to execute conveyance in favour of the Society within four months
from the date on which the co-operative Society is duly constituted.
The Conveyance to Housing Societies and
other Societies, is a pressing issue in Mumbai; and rest of India may not be an
exception. The Developers do not Convey land to in favour of Societies to
retain control over the administration of the Building; and probably to claim
further development rights over the said land, which may accrue in future.
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the
Case of Ratna Rupal CHS [2011 (5) BCR 561, also referred in 2015 (5) MhLJ 318,
2016 (5) MhLJ 102] have made some very interesting observations:
Para 10: The Conveyance had to be
executed within the specified period. The conveyance was not executed for a
number of years. The Plaintiff (Society)
must be taken to have had full title in the entire plot of land on which their
building came to be constructed.
Para 27: Further, the failure and
neglect to register the society and convey the property would certainly not
give any right to the Developer to step upon the property or to claim any FSI.
The FSI belongs to the plot. The plot
must be taken to be conveyed after the statutory period.
The legal inference which can be drawn
from the aforesaid observation is that – the Society is deemed to be the Owner
of the subject land and only formal transfer / Conveyance is required.
Nevertheless, the issue remains as what
legal remedy is available if the Developer neglects to execute Conveyance.
The remedy of deemed Conveyance is
already on the table; but it appears to have not redressed the issue as thought
of. The remedy of Consumer Court also failed to its expectation. The remedy
before Civil Court by way of Civil Suit is always available.
I am of the view that remedy before
Civil Court by way of Civil Suit may be effective, seeking Mandatory Injunction
to Execute Document of Conveyance. It may be effective and economical for the
following reasons –
Since it is a Statutory obligation,
there will not be any Court fee on this Relief of Mandatory Injunction.
This relief of Mandatory Injunction may
also be sought by way of Interim Relief, during the pendency of Suit.
If despite the Decree which may be
passed at the Interim stage, the Developer neglects to Execute Conveyance,
then, apart from other legal recourse that are available, by virtue of and in
accordance with Order XXI, Rules 34 and 80 of CPC, 1908, the Document of
Conveyance may be Executed and Registered by the Officer of the Court.
Nevertheless, the other Reliefs of
damages, declaration, prohibitive Injunction, if any, may also be sought
alongwith Mandatory Injunction.
I am of certain view that once the
Society is duly constituted, the Developer would not have any sustainable plea,
to resist Execution of Conveyance, more particularly for the reasons, the MOFA doesn’t
stipulate any such condition.
Sandeep Jalan
Advocate
https://www.litigationplatform.com/
Comments