Skip to main content

The Preceipe for Justice

 
1. I am excited to share an Ordinary, yet an extra-Ordinary ruling of Bombay High Court, which in my view, would may become a Template, in the dispensation of Justice.

2. The Petitioners were in Writ Jurisdiction. The issue before the Court was inherently complex the property tax Assessment. There were cluster of facts, allegations and counter allegations. The easiest approach of the Court would have been to relegate the Petitioners to Statutory Appeal provided under the MMC Act, 1888.

3. The Hon’ble Court didn’t. It took upon the pains to decide the issue, despite the fact that Appeal was already preferred and pending before the Hon’ble Small Causes Courts.

4. Observations of the Hon’ble Court: The assessing authority held that land under construction cannot be treated as vacant land. Though the issue whether the land under construction can be treated as vacant land is subject matter of appeal pending before the Small Causes Court and ordinarily I would not have gone into the question but since the said question is pure question of law and goes to the root of the matter and further it has been examined by the concerned authority in the impugned order, I think it would be in the interest of justice if the said question is considered and decided in the present writ petition instead of leaving it to be decided by Small Causes Court in appeal and then further appeal before this Court. The sole question, therefore, before me is whether the Asstt. Assessor & Collector, "D" Ward was justified in holding that the land under construction cannot be treated as vacant plot of land within the meaning of sec. 154 of the B.M.C. Act. The Judgment was delivered by Justice R.M. Lodha. Reported in 1998 (1) BCR 397 : 1997 (3) BLR 327.

5. Author’s view: Whether a “Plea / Issue” raises a pure question of law, or raises a pure question of fact, or if raises a mixed question of fact and law, the same may be ascertained by employing the following test -

6. If the Plea / issue can be decided by employing the mandate of law, the Plea / Issue raises a pure question of law. In such pleas, the basic material facts must not be in dispute.

7. If the Plea / issue have to be decided by leading evidence, the Plea / Issue raises a pure question of fact. The third category of mixed question of fact and law is covered under this category. This is because, the pleas of disputed facts would be decided by employing the mandate of law. Thus, every plea of question of fact, also raises mixed question of fact and law.

8. The Petitioners must crystallize central issue to be confined in the Mentioning Preceipe, to persuade the Ld. Judge - The Petition raises a pure question of law. Please decide.

Sandeep Jalan
Advocate
https://www.litigationplatform.com/

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Commercial Courts / Suits - Pleadings and Procedure

The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015 – A broad framework In order to ensure speedy disposal of disputes which arises from commercial transactions involving high value, the Parliament of India has come out with a unique legislation namely, The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015; wherein Commercial Courts / Divisions are to be constituted in the existing district Courts and in High Courts; and wherein disputes arising from specified commercial dealings involving claim of Rs.1.00 Crore or above would be adjudicated by these newly constituted commercial Courts / Divisions. By virtue of recent Amendments, the limit of Rs.1.00 crore has been reduced to Rs.3.00 Lakhs; and accordingly claims relating to commercial disputes involving Rs.3.00 Lakhs could now be maintainable under this special regime.  And accordingly, the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is substantially amended, wherein new Order XIII-A and XV-A are inserted, apart from new Order XI, Sections 35 for costs, Verification of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leading Evidence during trial

1.       In case where the accused refused to plead guilty of the offence to which he is charged with, and claims to be tried, the Court calls upon the Prosecution / Complainant to lead all the evidences he has in support of his case. 2.       In criminal trial, the evidence are required to be led by the complainant and / or their witnesses by stepping into the witness box and illustrating / demonstrating to what they have witnessed. The Complainant is to examine before the Court, himself, and all other witnesses, who are “witness” to the crime, which is alleged to have been committed by the accused named in the complaint. This examination of himself and other prosecution witnesses is called “Examination – in – Chief. 3.       Giving evidence of facts is critical to any trial, be it civil trial or criminal trial. And therefore, it becomes imperative to understand the dynamics of evidence in legal sens...
1 comment
Read more

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more