What are provisions of law which
deals with False Complaints: It
is a Criminal offence under sections 182 and 211 of Indian Penal Code (IPC),
1860 to knowingly make / record a false complaint / accusation against any
person before any Public authority / Police.
Section
182 of IPC states that a person commits an offence when he records a complaint
before any public servant, being aware of that the complaint which he is making
is false; and that by making such false complaint, the said Public Servant would exercise his powers to the injury or annoyance of
the said person. In law, the injury implies any harm, illegally caused
to any person, in body, mind, reputation or property.
Section
211 of IPC states that a person commits an offence when he, with the intention
to cause injury to a person, knowingly, and without any just or lawful grounds,
initiate any criminal proceeding, or makes a false accusation of offence against
him, whether before Police or before any Court of law.
What Remedy for False Complaints: In
such cases of false complaints, the victim of false complaint cannot register F.I.R.
or make private complaint to Magistrates court under these above sections, against
those persons who have allegedly made false Complaint.
In
such cases of false complaints, a complaint can only be made to the Public /
Police Officer to whom false complaint has been made, or complaint may be made
to an Authority higher in Rank to the said Public officer, and the said Public
officer or the higher authority, is empowered to file the case in the
Magistrates Court against the person who has made false complaint.
In
cases of false accusation of offence before Police, if the matter did not
reached the Court of law for trial and proceedings / investigation terminated,
then, a direct Complaint u/s 200 or Application u/s 156(3) of CrPC, 1973, can
be made before the Magistrates court concerned against those persons who have
made false charge of offence.
In
cases where, in pursuance to said false accusation of offence, criminal
proceedings before the Magistrates Court / Sessions Court have been initiated,
then, an Application u/s 340 read with section 195 of CrPC 1973, may be
preferred before the said Magistrate / Sessions court, against those persons,
praying therein before Magistrates / Sessions court to refer the said offence
of false accusation to the appropriate / competent Magistrate Court of
jurisdiction.
When these Complaints can be made: However,
it is important to note that remedy provided for victims of false complaints under
these two sections 182 and 211, can only be availed after (a) where the
Complaint made before Public Servant / Public Authority is formally closed,
with the observations / findings that the Complaint so made was frivolous /
baseless / false / wanting in evidence; or where the Police before / after
registering FIR, has terminated the investigation on the ground of falsity
of complaint, or (b) where FIR is quashed by the concerned High Court, or
(c) where if the trial Court has discharged the Accused or has acquitted the
Accused with the observations / findings that the Complaint so made was
frivolous / baseless / false / wanting in evidence, and no Appeal is preferred
against the acquittal. However, at the same time, it must also be kept in mind
that remedy provided under these two sections are availed keeping in mind the
limitation period provided u/ss 467 to 473 of CrPC, 1973.
What are False Claims: False
claim means seeking reliefs which the one is not entitled to seek. It is a
criminal offence to knowingly make a false claim in the Court of law and is punishable u/s 209 of IPC, 1860. Section
209 states that a person commits an offence when he, with intent to injure or
annoy a person, knowingly makes a false claim before the Court of law.
What Remedy for
False Claims: In cases of allegedly false Claims, the victim
cannot register F.I.R. or make private complaint to Magistrates court for false
claims. In such cases, criminal proceedings may be initiated against those person
by making an Application u/s 340 read with section 195 of CrPC 1973, before the
concerned trial Court / Tribunal, praying therein to refer the said offence of
“false claim”, to the competent Magistrate Court of jurisdiction. Such
Application may also be made before concerned High Court under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India read with section 195(4) of CrPC, 1973.
If
a Civil Suit making false claim is filed or if frivolous defense / claim is
made in the written statement, then, depending upon the facts of the case,
following provisions of CPC, 1908 may be invoked for expeditious disposal of
the Suit.
a)
Order VII Rule 11(a) – The Plaint fails to disclose cause of
action;
b)
Order XII Rule 6: Judgment on Admission
c)
Order VI Rule 16 r/w definition of “Facts in Issue” contained in
section 3 of Evidence Act, 1872, r/w section 101 of Evidence Act r/w mandate of
“cause of action”: To strike out / delete any factual proposition of fact in
the Plaint / Written Statement which is unnecessary, scandalous, frivolous or
vexatious, followed by Application under Order XII Rule 6, stated hereinbefore.
d)
Order IX Rule 6 or Order VIII Rule 10: For Ex-parte decree or for
failure to file Written Statement
e)
Order XIV Rule 1,2, 6 – determination of Suit on issue of law or
on issue agreed upon;
f)
Order 19 R.3 – Verification Clause
What Remedies if False F.I.R. is registered,
or False FIR is anticipated to have been registered, and arrest is anticipated:
(i) A brief letter may be recorded to the concerned Police station, with a
copy to Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of Police, stating therein
that a false complaint is filed against “me” and I am willing to fully
cooperate in the Investigation; and advising the Police authority that in case
the Police intends to arrest the Person named in the allegedly false FIR, then
they should scrupulously / strictly follow the due process of law as contained
u/ss 157(1), 41(1)(b)(i)(ii), 41(2), 41A r/w section 60-A of CrPC, 1973; and
also strictly adhere to the guidelines framed by SC in the Arnesh Kumar case
2014 and in the Joginder Kumar case 1994. The said letter may also be submitted to
Police station if arrest is made, stating that arrest is grossly unlawful.
(ii) Obtain Anticipatory Bail from Sessions court or High Court u/s 438 of
CrPC, 1973; with an alternative prayer / Relief that in case the Hon’ble Court
is not inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail, then, if the Police intends to
arrest the person/s named in the FIR, the Police shall scrupulously / strictly
follow the due process of law as contained u/ss 157(1), 41(1)(b)(i)(ii), 41(2),
41A r/w section 60-A of CrPC, 1973; and also strictly adhere to the guidelines
framed by SC in the Joginder Kumar case and Arnesh Kumar case.
(iii) In lieu of Application for Anticipatory Bail or where Anticipatory Bail
is refused, a Writ Petition in the respective High Court under Article 226 of
Constitution of India may be filed, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, that, in the
light of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees that No
person shall be deprived of his life and “personal liberty”, except according
to the procedure established by law, and thereby praying before the HC to
direct the Police authorities, not to mechanically arrest on mere filing of FIR
and Police to scrupulously follow the due process of law as contained in
sections 157(1), 41(1)(b)(i)(ii), 41(2), 41A r/w section 60-A of CrPC, 1973 and
strictly adhere to the guidelines framed by SC in the Joginder Kumar case and
Arnesh Kumar case, in case the Police intends to arrest the Petitioner (the
person named in the FIR).
(iv) An application u/s 156(3) or complaint u/s 200, to Judicial Magistrate /
Metropolitan Magistrate, against those Police officers if they have “knowingly”
registered false FIR / or have falsely arrested / or if are falsely prosecuting
the case, alleging therein your complaint that said Police officer have
committed the offence defined u/ss 218 and 220 or 342 of IPC, 1860, as the case
may be. Nevertheless, a regular FIR can also be lodged against the said Police
officers u/s 154.
(v) An Application u/s 482 of CrPC, 1973 may be preferred, before
respective High Court, to quash the said false FIR on the grounds that (a) “acts”
and “omission” attributed towards the accused person in the FIR does not
constitute the offence alleged; or (b) no such alleged incident occurred; or
(c) FIR contains bare allegations without connecting the accused towards the
alleged crime; or (d) there are unimpeachable evidence to show that the offence
could not have been committed by the accused, and the accused would be
needlessly harassed of the inevitable agony of criminal proceedings.
Sandeep Jalan
Advocate
Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.
https://www.litigationplatform.com/
Thank you.
Comments
AAT 移民上诉