Introduction of
law is a basic incident of a democracy. The system of Laws came so that the
stronger might not have their way at their choices, but according to law. In
modern times, Peoples' Security and Progress are sought to be secured through
codified laws and scheme of Justice is thus introduced to secure that Security
and Progress.
Section 3(29) of
General Clauses Act, 1897 defines Law as any
Act, ordinance, regulation, rule, order, bye-law or other instrument which has
the force of law. The first attribute of Law is “Rule of law”, which means “Ruled by Law”
and not by individual whims and fancies. This is also in fact and precisely one
of the mandates of Article 14 of our Constitution, which among other things,
guarantees equal protection of laws to all persons.
The attributes of law: A law or rule is
a common sense which is binding on you to obey. A law is a social necessity
prevailing over your own interest. Every
law, as far as possible, must have a certain degree to its application, and
must provoke intelligent proposition in the minds of the reader. A law is something which must have a
moral basis, so that there is a inner compelling force for every citizen to
obey. The law is to play its allotted role of serving the needs of the Society.
It must reflect ideas and ideologies of that society. It must keep pace with
the heartbeats of the society, and the needs and aspirations of the people. Laws are to be enforced simply because they are made; but unnecessary
laws are traps for extorting money, and suppress speech and expression.
Scheme of Justice: The accountability of a person
towards the Society or towards another individual has a close relation with the
concept of justice. The justice, in the ordinary sense, is a process whereby a
person is held accountable for his actions and inactions.
And if we say
that there is no justice in our country, it follows that persons are not held
accountable for their wrongful, unauthorized and illegal actions, implying
governance by whims and fancies of powerful individuals, be in politics or
otherwise. The scheme of Justice also implies the giving of every man his due.
The exercise of
adjudicating and declaring rights and legal obligation of parties, by employing
laws of the land and the principle of equity, by a competent court of
jurisdiction, may be called as the exercise of administering justice.
There are two essential
and indispensible feature of any justice dispensation framework. First, the
Court / Tribunal must secure that all parties before it must be given proper
opportunity to present their case; and second, the presiding judicial officer
should not have any personal interest in the subject matter presented before it
for adjudication.
The birth of a Litigation: The accrual of
cause of action gives birth to a litigation and the absence of it results in
ceasing of the litigation. Accrual of cause of action implies and presupposes
infringement of litigant’s some statutory right / fundamental right / equitable
right / contractual right / or any other right recognized under the statutes or
customs. For the locus to move the court of law,
the right sought to be enforced, should have already come into existence, and
there should be an infringement of it, or at least a serious and imminent
threat exist of its infringement.
Nature
of Reliefs claimed, lies at the heart of any litigation. These “Reliefs
claimed” also decides the jurisdiction of the Court, as whether it is competent
for that Court to grant such Reliefs. Further, every Relief which is being
claimed presupposes the existence of certain facts, which are required to be
pleaded and proved. These may be called material facts of the case. The legal
process in the Court of law is initiated by the presentation / institution of a
Case, whether in the form of a Suit, Petition, Application etc, in the
competent court of jurisdiction.
The act of causing harm to another may gives rise to two
different kinds of liabilities – Civil and Criminal, and both Civil and
Criminal actions may be adopted for the same grievance. Also, any legal action
must be commenced within a particular time frame depending on the nature of the
dispute.
Decision making process: Broadly, the decision
making process is – the Claimant comes before the Court of law claiming certain
Reliefs; pleads material facts of the case; the Court calls upon the adversary
to file his reply to the allegations made (not in criminal trials); litigating
parties lead evidence in support of the facts asserted; the court examine the
relevancy, truthfulness and credibility of such evidences, apply the applicable
laws in the appreciation of evidences and materials which are before it; and
would record the findings on each of the material fact, and pass Order.
I am receiving justice even if all the Reliefs asked
for, are being turned down by the Court: I am talking about, among other
important things, reasoned decisions of the Courts and Tribunals, including
decisions of Administrative Authorities.
Reasoned decisions are inescapable in the entire scheme of administration
of Justice. Reasons disclose how the mind is applied to the subject matter and
reveal a rational nexus between the facts considered and conclusions reached. The reasons employed not only be
intelligible but which will also deal with the substantial points which have
been raised. An unreasoned Order
presupposes the non consideration of submissions on record made by the Party
therein and in the absence of reasons, the opportunity of hearing would be
rendered meaningless and empty formality, and thus in essence occasions the
breach of principles of natural justice. The very search for reasons will put
the judge on alert and minimize the chances of unconscious infiltration of
personal bias or unfairness in the conclusion. Please refer decision of the Apex Court – Kranti
Associates [AIR 2010 SCW 5715]
Truth is the foundation of justice: Right from
inception of the judicial system it has been accepted that discovery,
vindication and establishment of truth are the main purposes underlying the
existence of the courts of justice. Lord Denning (Judge of the
England) observed in a case before it, “It's all very well to paint justice
blind, but she does better without a bandage round her eyes. She should be
blind indeed to favour or prejudice, but clear to see which way lies the truth..." [AIR 2012 SC 1727].
There cannot be blind adherence to the letter of the
law: In Raghubir Saran versus State of
Bihar– “The Courts exist not only for securing obedience to law of the land but
also for securing ends of justice in its widest sense. All Courts, including
the HC can exercise such powers as the law of the land confers upon them as
well as such inherent powers to do justice as are preserved expressly or are
not taken away by a Statute. It is necessary to remember that courts are
established to do justice. [AIR 1964 SC 1]
The
notions of justice are not litigant centric:
In every case before the Court of law, the rule of law is at stake. I will begin
with the words of Sir Lionel Fox, an acclaimed Penologist of England. He quotes
the example of an 18th Century Judge who passed sentence of death saying, “You
are to be hanged not because you have stolen a sheep, but in order that others
may not steal.” He continued, “Executions are intended to draw spectators, and
if they don’t, Executions do not serve their purposes.” The business of Justice
is to reduce crime & prevent mischief in the society. So evident is the
truth of this simple great idea, if realized by presiding judges, will bring
good deal of respect for law in the society.
Adjudication of dispute in a reasonable time: Speedy disposal
of court cases is the basic necessity of life in a democracy and it is the
Courts who gives life to laws and rules otherwise they are a show piece in
books of law. Abstract declaration of rights without definite means and
machinery to enforce rights is deception played by Govts. The absence of adjudication
of cases in a time bound manner brings prosperity to corrupt and law breakers;
and spell misery, annoyance and frustration for the innocent and for law
abiders; and Courts and the Govts. support corrupt and law breakers and spell
misery, annoyance and frustration to the innocent and law abiders, when they
ignore securing adjudication of cases in a time bound manner.
Governance
is based on perceptions: A
man act as what he believes, i.e. all his actions are founded on his perception
/ belief of certain things. A man whilst breaking law, thinks of the prevailing
justice system, and then proceeds to break the law. For example: An offender of
law normally believes that no law works, hence his behaviour is towards
disregard of laws. At the same time, many a times the victim also believes that
no law works, and he accept the injustice. And this is how the society
progress... to lawlessness.
Nearly two
centuries ago, Justice John Marshall, the Chief Justice of American Supreme
Court warned that the power of Judiciary lies, not in deciding cases, nor in
imposing sentences, nor in punishing for contempt, but in the trust, confidence
and faith of the common man [AIR 2007 SC
2725].
A Constitution,
no matter how well conceived, can only create institution on papers. Breathing
life into them is up to the succeeding generations. The concentrated view which
emerges runs to the effect that the greatest guarantee of Justice is not the
law but the personality of the Judge and the way he discharges his duties. Amidst
great challenges and shortcomings, the greatest thing about our democracy and (In)justice
system is that – both can be “Restored” to function.
Sandeep Jalan
Advocate
Sandeep Jalan
Advocate
Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.
https://www.litigationplatform.com/
Thank you.
Comments
You are always throwing light on vital aspects of law which is proving very much helpful to all the lawyers as well as people of India. I thank you very much for the extensive research you go through to give such valuable output.
Regards
Adv. Rana Sarda
Nanded