Important principles regulating the nature of interest / title and other aspects in an Immovable property
Apart from other important things, two
things have always been precious to every human life, one, his personal
liberty; and two, his properties, movables (including money) and immovables,
which sustain his life. In the present write up we will look into the
attributes of rights, interest and title in an immovable property.
Section 3(26)
of General Clauses Act, 1897 defines immovable property as which includes land,
benefits to arise out of land, and things attached to the earth, or permanently
fastened to anything attached to the earth; and Section 3 of Transfer of
property Act, 1882, defines “attached to the earth” as – (a) rooted in the
earth, as in the case of trees and shrubs; (b)
embedded in the earth, as in the case of walls or buildings; or (c) attached to what is so embedded for the permanent
beneficial enjoyment of that to which it is attached. According to definition
of immovable property provided under the Transfer of property Act, 1882,
standing timber, growing crops or grass are not regarded as immovable property.
Registration of an immovable
property is one of the most important attribute of an immovable property, as it
is a notice to the world at large about persons possessing the nature of
rights, title and interest including the encumbrances which are attached to an
immovable property; and section 17 of Registration Act provides for compulsory
registration of every transaction relating transfer of any right, title or
interest in an immovable property, including gifts of immovable property, but
excluding leases which are for less than a year, and further excluding such
mortgages which are created by merely depositing of title deeds.
Under the law, broadly,
three distinct legal actions lie in respect of an immovable property, namely –
(a) When a cloud is raised over a person’s title and he does not have a
possession, a Suit for declaration and possession, with or without a
consequential injunction is the remedy; (b) Where
a person claims title or interest, but he is out of possession, he has to sue
for possession and consequential injunction, may be alongwith declaration to
his title or interest; (c) Where there is
merely an interference with a person’s lawful possession or where there is a
threat of dispossession, or where there is a frustration or interference in the
free and full enjoyment of the property, it is sufficient to sue for an
injunction simpliciter.
The Sale of Immovable property:
The obligations of Seller and the buyer of immovable property are set out in
Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Whether the concerned
agreement is a “Sale deed” or is a “Contract for Sale”, is indicated u/s 54 of
Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Section 6 of the Transfer of property Act
enumerates what properties cannot be transferred.
Where the Agreement contemplates transfer of ownership, for an agreed price, the price
being paid or promised to be paid, or partly paid and partly promised to be
paid, followed by Registration of the Agreement, and followed by handing over
the possession of the said property, the said Agreement is construed as “Sale
deed”; and where under the Agreement, may be even oral, the parties have
arrived to an understanding that the sale of such property would take place on
terms settled between them, it is an contract for sale and such contract does
not create any interest in or charge on such property, except the right to move
the court of law for the specific performance of the said contract.
Section 55 of the Transfer of property
Act contains some fundamental features of transfer of an immovable property under
the agreement of “Sale deed”. It spells out the obligations and rights of
buyers and sellers, before and after “Sale”. However, the parties may vary
these obligations and waive their such rights by providing for in their
contract.
Buyer’s
Rights before completion of “Sale”: Section 55(6)(b) The buyer is having
a charge on the property for the amount he has paid under the contract;
Buyers’
Liability before completion of “Sale”: Section 55(5):
(b) to pay the
purchase money to the seller or to such person as he directs.
Seller’s
Rights before completion of “Sale”: Section 55(4)(a): The seller is
entitled to the rents and profits of the property till the ownership thereof
passes to the buyer;
Seller’s
Liability before completion of “Sale”: Section 55(1):
(a) to disclose to the buyer any
material defect in the property or in the seller's title thereto;
(b) to produce to the buyer on his
request for examination all documents of title relating to the property which
are in the seller's possession or power;
(c) to answer to the best of his
information all relevant questions put to him by the buyer in respect to the
property or the title thereto;
(d) on payment of the agreed price, execute
a proper conveyance of the property;
(e) to take as much care of the property
and all documents of title relating thereto which are in his possession' as an
owner of ordinary prudence would take of such property and documents;
(g) to pay all public charges and rent
accrued due in respect of the property up to the date of the sale, the interest
on all encumbrances on such property due on such date, and, except where the
property is sold subject to encumbrances, to discharge all encumbrances on the
property then existing.
Buyer’s
Rights after completion of “Sale”: Section 55(6)(a): The buyer is
entitled where the ownership of the property has passed to him, to the benefit
of any improvement in, or increase in value of, the property, and to the rents
and profits thereof.
Buyer’s
Liability after completion of “Sale”: Section 55(5):
(d) to pay all public charges and rent
which may become payable in respect of the property, the principal moneys due
on any encumbrances subject to which the property is sold, and the interest
thereon afterwards accruing due.
Seller’s
Rights after completion of “Sale”: Section 55(4)(b) In cases where
the ownership of the property has passed to the buyer and where the whole of
the agreed price is not paid, the seller is entitled to a charge upon the
property for the unpaid amount;
Seller’s
Liability after completion of “Sale”: Section 55(1)(f) The seller is
bound to give, on being so required, the buyer, or such person as he directs,
possession of the property as its nature admits;
Section
55(2)
The seller shall be deemed to contract with the buyer that the interest which
the seller professes to transfer to the buyer subsists and that he has power to
transfer the same.
Section
55(3)
Where the whole of the purchase money has been paid to the seller, he is also
bound to deliver to the buyer all documents of title relating to the property
which are in the seller's possession or power.
An Agreement for
transfer of property implies a contract not only to execute the deed of
transfer but also to appear before the Registering Officer and to admit
execution thereby facilitating the registration of the document wherever it is
compulsory.
Multiple
transfer of an immovable property: Where in cases, a person has over a
period of time, transferred an immovable property, to more than one person, and
such transfer of property cannot co-exist, by virtue of mandate of Section 48
of Transfer of property Act, 1882, each later created right shall, in the
absence of a special contractor reservation binding the earlier transferees, is
subject to the rights previously created.
Transfer
of property pending suit relating thereto: Where in cases, any transfer of
an immovable property is effected, the property in respect of which a Suit or
proceeding is pending in any Court having authority, and in such Suit or
proceedings, any right to immovable property is directly and specifically in
question, the said transfer of property would be subject to the any decree or
order which may be made in the said Suit or proceeding. [Section 52 of Transfer
of Property Act, 1882]
Immovable
property in the joint names: Where any immovable property exist in
the joint name of two or more persons, and the dispute arises between those
joint holders as to their respective share in the said immovable property,
section 45 of Transfer of property Act, 1882 furnishes the answer to this
dispute. The said section says that in cases where the money was paid for the
purchase of said immovable property out of a common fund belonging to those
joint holders, the joint holders are respectively entitled to interests in such
immovable property identical, as nearly as may be, with the interests to which
they were respectively entitled in their common fund, unless there exist any
terms of the contract otherwise specifying the nature of interest of said joint
holders;
And, where the money was paid for the
purchase of said immovable property out of separate funds belonging to joint
holders individually, they are respectively entitled to interests in such
proportion they have contributed to the total purchase money paid, unless there
exist any terms of the contract otherwise specifying the nature of interest of
said joint holders;
And, in cases where there is no evidence
as to the interests in the fund to which the joint holders were respectively
entitled to, or as to the money which they respectively advanced, such joint
holders shall be presumed to have share in equal proportion.
Now I would be briefly discussing the
law on gifts of immovable property, fraudulent transfers, the concept of
tenants-in-common and joint tenancy.
What
is gift: Gift
is the transfer of certain existing movable or immovable property, belonging to
the person, which is made voluntarily and without any price. The person who
gifts is called the donor, and the person to whom it is given is called the donee.
The transaction of gift is said to be complete, when the said gift is formally
accepted by the donee during the lifetime of the donor. If the donee dies
before acceptance, the gift is invalid. [Section 122 of Transfer of Property
Act, 1882] A gift comprising future
property is void. [Section 124 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882]
Gifts
which include obligations, “onerous gifts”: Where a gift is in the form of a
single transfer to the same person of several things of which one is, and the
others are not, burdened by an obligation, the donee can take nothing by the
gift unless he accepts the gift fully, i.e. both the benefits and the
obligations. And where a gift is in the form of two or more separate and
independent transfers to the same person of several things, the donee is at
liberty to accept one of them and refuse the others, although the acceptance
may only be of the beneficial and the refusal is of the onerous. [Section 127
of Transfer of Property Act, 1882]
How
gift of immovable property is to be effected: For the purpose of making a gift
of immovable property, the transfer must be effected by a registered instrument
signed by or on behalf of the donor, and attested by at least two witnesses.
However, putting in possession is not a condition precedent to effect a valid
gift. The donor may continue to be in the possession of the gifted property.
[Section 123 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882]
How
gift of movable property is to be effected: For the purpose of making a gift
of movable property, the transfer may be effected either by a registered
instrument signed or by delivery. Such delivery may be made in the same way as
goods sold may be delivered. A gift of movable property may also be made in
contemplation of death of the donor, and in such cases the requirements stated
in Section 123 may not be complied with. [Sections 123 and 129 of Transfer of
Property Act, 1882]
Whether
gift can be suspended or revoked: A gift may be suspended or revoked where the donor and donee agrees that on the
happening of any specified event, such event which does not depend on the will
of the donor, a gift shall be suspended or revoked; but a gift which the
parties agree shall be revocable wholly or in part, at the mere will of the
donor, is void wholly or in part, as the case may be. Further, a gift may also
be revoked in any of the cases in which, if the gift is in the nature of a
contract between the donor and the donee, and in that case the contract of gift
may declared to be cancelled. However, the gift cannot be suspended or revoked
in cases of alleged want or failure of price. [Section 126 of Transfer of
Property Act, 1882]
What
are the rights of the transferee under suspended or revoked gift: Where in a case
the property which was gifted, was lawfully suspended or revoked by the donor
of the property, and is yet transferred by the donee, in that situation, the
rights of transferees under the said transaction of transfer is not frustrated,
provided two conditions are satisfied – (a) if the transfer is for valuable
consideration and (b) the transferee has no notice of such suspension or
revocation of the gift. [Section 126 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882]
What
is the extent of liability of beneficiary under a gift: Where a gift
consists of the donor's whole property, the donee is personally liable for all
the debts due by and liabilities of the donor at the time of the gift, to the extent
of the value of the property comprised therein in the gift; including the
liability as provided in onerous gifts stated hereinabove. [Sections 127, 128
of Transfer of Property Act, 1882].
Very
Important:
All aforesaid provisions of law of gift are subject to any rule of Mohammedan
law in respect of gift.
“Tenant
in Common” and “Joint Tenancy”: It is very important to understand the
concept of “Tenant in Common” and “Joint Tenancy”. These concepts, however, has
nothing to do with “Tenancy”. They suggest the nature of ownership of the
property which is held by an individual. In India, the law of “Tenants in
Common” is followed, whereas in England “Joint Tenancy” is followed.
Tenants in common implies, where any
property is jointly held by two or more persons, every such person is absolute
owner of the property, in equal share, unless there is an express or implied
contract to suggest their individual percentage of holding.
Joint tenancy is a situation where if any
property is jointly held by two or more persons, every such person is not the absolute
owner of the property in equal share, unless there is an express or implied
contract to suggest their individual percentage of holding.
Like for example, if a property is owned
by two persons A and B jointly, than, unless there is any contract to suggest
otherwise, both A and B will have 50% share in the property; and in the event
of death of A, in cases of “Tenants in common”, the 50% share of A will go to
the heirs of A, and B will continue to have his 50%; whereas in case of “Joint
tenancy”, if A dies, B becomes the 100% owner of the property, that is to say,
the share of A devolves upon B. Similarly, in case of "Tenants in
Common" both A and B are entitled to dispose of their 50% share by way of
Will.
The
principle, that you can transfer only what you have: A transfer of
property passes forthwith to the transferee all the interest which the
transferor is then capable of passing in the property, and in the legal
incidents thereof, unless a different intention is expressed or necessarily
implied from the terms of the contract. Such incidents include, where the
property is land, the easements annexed thereto, the rents and profits thereof
accruing after the transfer, and all things attached to the earth; and, where
the property is machinery attached to the earth, the movable parts thereof;
and, where the property is a house, the easements annexed thereto, the rent
thereof accruing after the transfer, and the locks, keys, bars, doors, windows,
and all other things provided for permanent use therewith. [Section 8 of
Transfer of Property Act, 1882]
Deemed
knowledge of transfer of property / ownership of an immovable property /
possession of immovable property: Section 3 of the Transfer of property
Act, 1882, contains the fundamental principle in respect of transactions of any
immovable property. It says that a person is said to have “notice” of certain facts,
when he actually knows that fact, or when, but for wilful abstention from an
inquiry or search which he ought to have made, or gross negligence, he would
have known it. The explanation appended to the said section really laid down
the classic principles.
The first principle is that when a
transaction relating to an immovable property is duly effected by an registered
instrument, then any person interested to acquire any share or interest in the
said immovable property, is considered in law, that the said person has due
notice of the existence of the registered instrument which was effected
pursuant to the said immovable property, and the said person is duly bound by
the encumbrances or charge, if any were so created, in respect of that
immovable property.
The second principle is that any person interested
to acquire any share or interest in any immovable property, it would be deemed
that, that the said person has due notice of the title, if any, of such person
who is for the time being in actual possession of the concerned immovable
property.
Fraudulent
Transfers:
Where any immovable property is transferred with intent to defeat or delay the
creditors of the transferor, the said transfer of property may be challenged by
filing a Suit for declaration to that effect; and the said Suit shall be deemed
to be instituted on behalf of, or for the benefit of, all the creditors. However,
this proposition is subject to cases where the transferee acquires the rights
in good faith and by paying valuable price.
Where in a case, a transfer of immovable
property is effected without any price, and the said property is again
transferred for valuable price with intent to cheat the subsequent buyer, the
subsequent buyer may challenge the first transfer to be declared as void and
illegal. [Section 53 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882] Sections 421, 422, 423
and 424 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, also regards such fraudulent transfers as
punishable offence.
Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.
Law
Referencer: https://www.litigationplatform.com/
Thank you.
Comments