Skip to main content

The basis of having fundamental rights


1.      Since the 17th Century, human thinking have been veering around to the theory that man that is to say, every human being, has certain essential, basic, natural, and inalienable rights or freedoms, and it is the function of the State to recognize those rights and freedoms and allow them a free play, in order to preserve human liberty, human personality being duly developed, and an effective social and democratic life be promoted.

2.      According to LOCKE, (the English philosopher and physician of the 17th Century), every man (read Human being) is born, with a title to perfect freedom and uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of nature; and he has, by nature, a power to preserve his property, that is his life, liberty and estate, against the injuries and attempts of other men.

3.      The declaration of the French revolution, 1789, which may be regarded as a concrete political statement on Human rights, and which was inspired by LOCKEian philosophy, declared – “The aim of all political association is the conservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man”.

4.      In modern times, it is widely accepted that the right to liberty is the very essence of a free society, and the said liberty must be safeguarded at all times. The idea of guaranteeing certain rights is to ensure that a person may have a minimum guaranteed freedom.

5.      The underlying idea of embodying certain basic and fundamental rights, is to take them out of the reach of the transient political majorities. It has, therefore, come to be regarded as essential, that these rights be integrated in such a way that they may not be violated, tempered or interfered with by an oppressive government.

6.      With this end in view, certain written constitutions, including of ours, guarantee a few rights to their people and forbid governmental organs from interfering with the same. In that case, a guaranteed right can be abridged or be taken away, but only by the elaborate and formal process of Constitutional Amendments, rather than by ordinary legislation. These rights are characterized as fundamental rights.

7.      Coming to our land, a few good reasons made the enunciation of fundamental rights in our Constitutional texts as inevitable proposition. During the British Rule in India, human rights were violated by the British Rulers on a very wide scale; and, the main political party, the Congress, therefore, had for long been demanding these rights against the British Rulers. Therefore, the framers of the Constitution, many of whom had suffered long incarceration during the British Regime, had a very positive attitude towards these rights.

8.      Further, the Indian society is fragmented into many religious, cultural and linguistic groups, and it was necessary to secure fundamental rights, to give to the people a sense of security and confidence, for, there was a potential danger that the majority in the Legislature may enact such laws which may be oppressive to individuals or to any minority groups; and such a danger could be minimized, by having a Bill of Rights in the Constitution.

9.      Also, it was believed that people should have some rights which may be enforced against the government which may become arbitrary at times.

10. The need to have the fundamental rights in the Constitution was so very well accepted on all the hands that in the Constituent Assembly the point was not even considered as whether or not to have such fundamental rights in the Constitutional body. In fact, the fight all along were against the restrictions being imposed upon the fundamental rights; and the effort all along was to have the fundamental rights were put on as broad and pervasive basis as possible. The object of having certain fundamental rights in the body of the Constitution was to secure the inviolability of certain essential rights against the political vicissitudes.

11. Fundamental rights has two aspects – firstly, they act as a fetter on plenary legislative powers; and secondly, they provide conditions for fuller development of our people, including their individual dignity. (2012) 6 SCC 1 (32).

12. The fundamental rights are being declared as a basic feature and constitute as a basic structure of our Constitutional framework. They cannot be contravened or abridged by any statutory or Constitutional provision. Any law that abrogates or abridges such rights would be violative of the doctrine of basic structure. Freedom guaranteed under Part III have been liberally construed by various pronouncement of the Apex Court of our country in the last six decades. The object being to place citizens at a centre stage and make the State accountable.  (2010) 3 SCC 571.

13. In the landmark case of Ajay Hasia, the Apex Court said, “It must be remembered that the Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees given to the people of India and are not merely paper hopes or fleeting promises and so long as they find a place in the Constitution, they should not be allowed to be emasculated in their application by a narrow and constricted judicial interpretation. AIR 1981 SC 487.

14. The Apex Court acts as “sentinel on the qui vive” in relation to the fundamental rights. Commenting on its role entrusted to it under the Constitution to protect fundamental rights, in the landmark case of Daryao, the Apex Court said, “The fundamental rights are intended not only to protect individual's rights but they are based on high public policy. Liberty of the individual and the protection of his fundamental rights are the very essence of the democratic way of life adopted by the Constitution, and it is the privilege and the duty of this Court to uphold those rights. This Court would naturally refuse to circumscribe them or to curtail them except as provided by the Constitution itself”. AIR 1961 SC 1457.


15. It deserves mention of critical observation of the Apex Court in a Constitution Bench of Nine Judges, in I R Coelho Case – (2007) 2 SCC 1 : AIR 2007 SC 861: In this case, the court tried to explain the basic structure theory and said that it is the duty of the Courts to uphold the Constitutional values and enforce Constitutional limitations as the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution; The role of a judiciary is to protect fundamental rights.

Para 57: The fundamentalism of fundamental rights has thus to be examined having regard to the enlightened point of view as a result of development of fundamental rights over the years. It is, therefore, imperative to understand the nature of guarantees under fundamental rights as understood in the years that immediately followed after the Constitution was enforced when fundamental rights were viewed by this Court as distinct and separate rights. In early years, the scope of the guarantee provided by these rights was considered to be very narrow. Individuals could only claim limited protection against the State. This position has changed since long. Over the years, the jurisprudence and development around fundamental rights has made it clear that they are not limited, narrow rights but provide a broad check against the violations or excesses by. the State authorities. The fundamental rights have in fact proved to be the most significant constitutional control on the Government, particularly legislative power. This transition from a set of independent, narrow rights to broad checks on state power is demonstrated by a series of cases that have been decided by this Court....

Para 61: It is evident that it can no longer be contended that protection provided by fundamental rights comes in isolated pools. On the contrary, these rights together provide a comprehensive guarantee against excesses by state authorities. Thus post Maneka Gandhi's case it is clear that the development of fundamental rights has been such that it no longer involves the interpretation of rights as isolated protections which directly arise but they collectively form a comprehensive test against the arbitrary exercise of state power in any area that occurs as an inevitable consequence. The protection of fundamental rights has, therefore, been considerably widened.

Para 63: The abrogation or abridgment of the fundamental rights under Chapter III have, therefore, to be examined on broad interpretation, the narrow interpretation of fundamental rights chapter is a thing of past. Interpretation of the Constitution has to be such as to enable the citizens to enjoy the rights guaranteed by Part III in the fullest measure.

Regarding the status and stature in respect of fundamental rights in Constitutional scheme, it is to be remembered that Fundamental Rights are those rights of citizens or those negative obligations of the State which do not permit encroachment on individual liberties. The State is to deny no one equality before the law. The object of the Fundamental Rights is to foster the social revolution by creating as society egalitarian to the extent that all citizens are to be equally free from coercion or restriction by the State. By enacting Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles which are negative and positive obligations of the States, the Constituent

Para 103: Fundamental rights enshrined in Part III were added to the Constitution as a check on the State power, particularly the legislative power. Through Art. 13, it is provided that the State cannot make any laws that are contrary to Part III. The framers of the Constitution have built a wall around certain parts of fundamental rights, which have to remain forever, limiting ability of majority to intrude upon them. That wall is the 'Basic Structure doctrine. Under Art. 32, which is also part of Part III. Supreme Court has been vested with the power to ensure compliance of Part III. The responsibility to judge the constitutionality of all laws is that of judiciary.

Para 106: The fundamental rights have always enjoyed a special and privileged place in the Constitution. Economic growth and social equity are the two pillars of our Constitution which are linked to the rights of an individual (right to equal opportunity), rather than in the abstract. Some of the rights in Part III constitute fundamentals of the Constitution like Art. 21 read with Arts. 14 and 15 which represent secularism, etc.

16. In the instant case at hand, the breach is fundamental. The law does not meet rational basis scrutiny; Legislative enactments bearing good intentions are not sufficed; they have to conform to and pass to our Constitutional standards.

17. Notwithstanding that any cruelty and violence within the family against women be curbed, nevertheless, any law purporting to address this social issue has to conform to Constitutional norms and dictates, more particularly the rigours of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.


Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.

Law Referencer: https://www.litigationplatform.com/



Thank you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Commercial Courts / Suits - Pleadings and Procedure

The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015 – A broad framework In order to ensure speedy disposal of disputes which arises from commercial transactions involving high value, the Parliament of India has come out with a unique legislation namely, The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015; wherein Commercial Courts / Divisions are to be constituted in the existing district Courts and in High Courts; and wherein disputes arising from specified commercial dealings involving claim of Rs.1.00 Crore or above would be adjudicated by these newly constituted commercial Courts / Divisions. By virtue of recent Amendments, the limit of Rs.1.00 crore has been reduced to Rs.3.00 Lakhs; and accordingly claims relating to commercial disputes involving Rs.3.00 Lakhs could now be maintainable under this special regime.  And accordingly, the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is substantially amended, wherein new Order XIII-A and XV-A are inserted, apart from new Order XI, Sections 35 for costs, Verification of Plea

Leading Evidence during trial

1.       In case where the accused refused to plead guilty of the offence to which he is charged with, and claims to be tried, the Court calls upon the Prosecution / Complainant to lead all the evidences he has in support of his case. 2.       In criminal trial, the evidence are required to be led by the complainant and / or their witnesses by stepping into the witness box and illustrating / demonstrating to what they have witnessed. The Complainant is to examine before the Court, himself, and all other witnesses, who are “witness” to the crime, which is alleged to have been committed by the accused named in the complaint. This examination of himself and other prosecution witnesses is called “Examination – in – Chief. 3.       Giving evidence of facts is critical to any trial, be it civil trial or criminal trial. And therefore, it becomes imperative to understand the dynamics of evidence in legal sense. To put it simply, leading / giving evidence means, proving the exis

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is being filed along with a copy of Domestic Incident Report by the: