Skip to main content

...the govt of India is riding on unguided sentiments of people of India....


To,
The Prime Minister of India,


PRESS TRUST OF INDIA:
GOVT MULLS MAKING MOLESTATION NON BAILABLE OFFENCE: http://www.ptinews.com/news/448264_Govt-mulls-making-molestation-non-bailable-offence

In the light of development that has took place in Ruchika case, it is heartening, with reluctance, to see that Govt of India is alive to issues that shock the conscience of the society. Although the govt of India is toying with the idea of making molestation a non bailable offence, square attention deserves to be given- How to identify, beforehand, instances of false and blackmailed complaints.


You will be destroying the entire fabric of the society. Man and boys may then be subject to untold harassment of false charges of molestation. Moreover, you know our police well. You will literally destroy entire life of a man if you put him behind the bar on mere allegation of false and black mailed complaint that is simply unavoidable. That man is then permanently be tagged as molester irrespective of any outcome.


Moreover, the govt and the Police alike, have turned a blind eye to a law settled by Supreme Court in JOGINDER KUMAR CASE IN 1994. In this case the Supreme Court has to the extent nearly abolished the colonial practice of arresting people on the basis of bailable or non bailable of offences. The SC in this landmark judgment has given due importance to the dignity of human life and to its liberty while at the same time maintaining a just balance between individual freedom and security of the society. The SC has in this Judgment framed guidelines as under which circumstances a person can be arrested, irrespective of cognizable or non cognizable offence, irrespective of offence is bailable or non bailable. http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.com/2009/06/final-word-on-law-of-arrests.html


Sir, does the non bailability of offences has reduced the occurrence of non bailable offences ? The pressing crisis that we are facing today, as far as, criminality and corruption is concerned, is that the rich, powerful and influential promises criminality with impunity and then they influence the investigation with quite ease. You know well who comprises the rich, powerful and influential. They will manage bail from our courts anyway.


SIR- YOU NEED TO ADDRESS AS HOW THESE INFLUENTIAL OFFENDERS OF LAW CAN BE PREVENTED FROM INFLUENCING THE INVESTIGATION. THE ANSWER LIES IN ANOTHER LANDMARK Supreme Court (SC)JUDGMENT GIVEN IN PRAKASH SINGH CASE IN 2006 FOR COMPLETE REVAMPING OF POLICE MACHINARY. THE JUDGMENT TOLD TO SEPARATE LAW AND ORDER FROM INVESTIGATION.


NO STATE GOVT IS SHOWING ANY SIGN OF IMPLEMENTING THESE REFORMS.


It is a conventional misleading idea to have stricter laws to deal with a pressing issue of this. However, Structural changes , as directed by SC in Prakah singh case to separate investigation from law and order, is required to have desired results.
Does the non bailability of offences has deterred the potential offenders of law. I am constrained to speak- the govt of India is riding on the unguided sentiments of people of India, the mass audience, who will hardly understand and appreciate the consequences of making this molestation a non bailable offence.



--
iN APPRECIATION,
Sandeep Jalan




Also Pls find:-

LINK TO INDIAN CITIZENS POCKET GUIDE TO POLICE LAWS:
http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.com/2009/04/indian-citizens-pocket-guide-to-police.html


LINK TO PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONS: GUIDELINES, PRINCIPLES, PROCEDURE:
http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-to-file-writ-petition-or-pil-writ.html


LINK TO: RESOLVE OFFICIALS NEGLIGENCE / ILLEGALITIES BY SERVING NOTICE U/S 80 OF CPC 1908:
http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.com/2009/09/resolve-public-officials-negligence.html


LINK TO SOME KEY LAW POINTS: PRE-LITIGATION, DURING-LITIGATION:
http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.com/2009/08/invaluable-key-points-for-present.html



BEING EMPOWERED IS FUN. RTI IS FUN: http://rti.gov.in/

Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.

Law Referencer: https://www.litigationplatform.com/


Thank you.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Commercial Courts / Suits - Pleadings and Procedure

The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015 – A broad framework In order to ensure speedy disposal of disputes which arises from commercial transactions involving high value, the Parliament of India has come out with a unique legislation namely, The Commercial Courts, Act, 2015; wherein Commercial Courts / Divisions are to be constituted in the existing district Courts and in High Courts; and wherein disputes arising from specified commercial dealings involving claim of Rs.1.00 Crore or above would be adjudicated by these newly constituted commercial Courts / Divisions. By virtue of recent Amendments, the limit of Rs.1.00 crore has been reduced to Rs.3.00 Lakhs; and accordingly claims relating to commercial disputes involving Rs.3.00 Lakhs could now be maintainable under this special regime.  And accordingly, the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is substantially amended, wherein new Order XIII-A and XV-A are inserted, apart from new Order XI, Sections 35 for costs, Verification of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leading Evidence during trial

1.       In case where the accused refused to plead guilty of the offence to which he is charged with, and claims to be tried, the Court calls upon the Prosecution / Complainant to lead all the evidences he has in support of his case. 2.       In criminal trial, the evidence are required to be led by the complainant and / or their witnesses by stepping into the witness box and illustrating / demonstrating to what they have witnessed. The Complainant is to examine before the Court, himself, and all other witnesses, who are “witness” to the crime, which is alleged to have been committed by the accused named in the complaint. This examination of himself and other prosecution witnesses is called “Examination – in – Chief. 3.       Giving evidence of facts is critical to any trial, be it civil trial or criminal trial. And therefore, it becomes imperative to understand the dynamics of evidence in legal sens...
1 comment
Read more

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more