Skip to main content

Parole gifted to manu sharma was illegal per se


Whereas manu sharma was found guilty of murdering model Jessica Lall and sentenced Life imprisonment;

And whereas he was granted Parole as per the law;

And whereas The Probation of offenders Act 1958 governs ‘Parole’;

And whereas section 3 & 4 govern who can be granted Parole;

Section 3 empowers court to release certain offenders after admonition (authoritative strict warning)- section says- where any person found guilty of offence of theft or offence of misappropriation of property, or any offence punishable for imprisonment upto two years….. may be granted

Section 4 empowers court to release certain offenders of good conduct. The section begins with the categorical and unambiguous declaration that Parole cannot be considered for any person who is found guilty of having committed an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life….

And whereas manu sharma was found guilty of murdering model Jessica Lall and sentenced Life imprisonment.

There is a Supreme Court Judgment... but you hardly need because the words of law are sparkling with clarity.

=======================

Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.

Sandeep Jalan

Advocate

Law Referencer: https://www.litigationplatform.com/


Thank you.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Recall Jurisdiction of the Courts

What is Recall of Orders of the Court ? But first….what is expected from the Orders of the Court – a)       While giving due consideration to the submissions and evidences on record of the rival parties, to record a reasoned finding with respect to disputed question of fact or of law; b)       Employing cogent reasons about the conclusion reached in the order / judgment. c)       Passing of orders in accordance with law. d)      Principles of natural justice are reasonably observed in the judicial proceeding. And when the Orders suffers from any of the vices, it is challenged by way of Review, Appeal or in Revision, alleging the impugned Order, being infected with either of the grounds, i.e. – a)       That there is Error apparent on the face of the Record; b)       That there is Perversity in the impugned Order; c)...
8 comments
Read more

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Chemistry of Section 55(6)(b) of T.O.P. Act, 1882, when r/w Article 62 of Limitation Act, 1963

The law is well settled that a Suit for Specific performance of a Contract, under Article 54 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, involving Sale of an immovable property, must be filed within three years from the date fixed for the performance of such contract, or, if no such date is fixed, when the Buyer has notice that performance is refused. Section 55(6)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, lays down buyer’s rights before completion of Sale transaction. The Section, inter alia, mandates that buyer is entitled to a charge on the property, as against the seller and all persons claiming under him, to the extent of the seller's interest in the property, for the amount of any purchase-money properly paid by the buyer in anticipation of the delivery and for interest on such amount, except in cases where the Buyer has improperly declined to accept delivery of the property. Therefore, a careful reading of Section 55(6)(b) would infer that a statutory charge is created  up...
3 comments
Read more