Skip to main content

Whilst SC Registry in Refuge of "There is no Law" regime............

Reg: "If Judges Assets can be made Public under RTI Scheme",

To, date: 7th May,2009
The Hon Chief Justice & Companion Judges
The Hon Delhi High Court
The office of the Registrar General,
Sher Shah Road,
New Delhi - 110003


Hon Justice,

In the backdrop of Delhi High Court going to decide "If Judges Assets can be made Public under RTI Scheme", the writer respectfully impress upon this Hon Court-

a) ambit of equity: Black's Law Dictionary: Aequitas est correctio legis generaliter latae qus parte deficit, meaning- Equity is the correction of that wherein the law by reason of its generality is deficient; Equity is certain correction applied to law because on account of its general comprehensiveness, without an exception, something is absent from it.

b) add value to life: Yet, forms of accountability may differ but the basic idea remains the same that the holders of Public Office must be able publicly justify their exercise of discretionary power not only as legally valid but also socially wise just and reasonable, chiefly designed to add something more to the quality of life of the people. Thus, Every Judge while interpreting laws and making Orders should make a note as to how the Order/ decision reached will benefit people or society at large.

Notwithstanding "fabulous" submissions so made by SC Registry in its defense to undisclose Judges Assets, the Writer is of the view that the Whole issue is boiled down to "If Resolutions passed by Supreme Court has attributes of Law."

Thanking you,

Sandeep Jalan


Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.
Tap “Lawyer” in your Cell to explore.
Android
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.vkn.app

iOS
https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1445427162

Thank you.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Recall Jurisdiction of the Courts

What is Recall of Orders of the Court ? But first….what is expected from the Orders of the Court – a)       While giving due consideration to the submissions and evidences on record of the rival parties, to record a reasoned finding with respect to disputed question of fact or of law; b)       Employing cogent reasons about the conclusion reached in the order / judgment. c)       Passing of orders in accordance with law. d)      Principles of natural justice are reasonably observed in the judicial proceeding. And when the Orders suffers from any of the vices, it is challenged by way of Review, Appeal or in Revision, alleging the impugned Order, being infected with either of the grounds, i.e. – a)       That there is Error apparent on the face of the Record; b)       That there is Perversity in the impugned Order; c)...
8 comments
Read more

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mumbai Capital Value Property Tax Judgment: A Rocket Science by Social Scientists; A Brief Analysis;

The subject of taxation is a “Rocket Science”. The constitution of Nine Judges Bench in the Mafatlal Industries Case, Reported in (1997) 5 SCC 536, running into more than 500 pages; the extremely contested Vodafone litigation; and the present Judgment of Bombay High Court running into 310 Pages, at least furnishes some justification to this statement of Rocket Science. There are umpteen Judgments, some of which are relied herein also (Para 147), that whilst dealing with challenge to Taxation laws, greater latitude is shown by Constitutional Courts, only for the reason that Taxation / Economic Legislation, by their very nature, are very complex. And hold on, the Regime of Property Tax based on Capital Value of the Property, was brought in force, on the recommendations of Tata Institute of “Social Sciences”. (Para 33 of the Judgment) Did these Social Scientist, nevertheless very respectable, would appreciate an Inch of what was discussed in 310 Pages of Judgment, even assuming t...
4 comments
Read more