Skip to main content

Profound yet utterly disregarded SC judgment in Ratlam Municipality Vs Vardichand case


Respected,

Time and again it is seen that Public Authorities plea paucity of funds as reason for their inability to fulfill their constitutional and statutory duties. Putting rest to this controversy in totality, in a landmark judgment given by Hon.SC in Municipality of Ratlam V Vardichand(1980)

The Hon. Court, thru Justice Krishna Iyer, Categorically rejected the contentions of Municipality, the plea of Paucity of funds as defense, for its failure in the due discharge of public duties.

The Court Said,"Statutes operates against Statutory bodies and Others regardless of the Cash in their coffers even as human rights under part Three of the Constitution have to be respected by the State regardless of Budgetary provisions.

Otherwise a profligate Statutory body or pachydermic Govt. Agency may legally defy duties under the Law by urging in self defense a self created bankruptcy or perverted expenditure budget. That cannot be."

May I suggest, Do we make a diamond studded golden frame of this Judgment and Present the same to CJI and to CJ of HCs, in any Public function to adorn the same in most appropriate place of Justice in SC/HC. Perhaps, the judges then may be constrained to give due respect to this Judgment, or at least the Litigants are impressed upon this landmark judgment.

SJ.

Legal issues !!
If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to register FIR, deliberately flawed investigations, etc (e) False FIRs (f) False Claims (g) False evidences (h) Grievances against Judges (i) Illegal or perverse Orders of the Courts / Tribunals, among others.
or
If you are looking for draft of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the nature and attribute of any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the procedure followed in any legal proceeding; or if you want to know the grounds on which any order of the court / tribunal is challenged; or if you are facing any frivolous litigation.

https://www.litigationplatform.com/


Thank you.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leading Evidence during trial

1.       In case where the accused refused to plead guilty of the offence to which he is charged with, and claims to be tried, the Court calls upon the Prosecution / Complainant to lead all the evidences he has in support of his case. 2.       In criminal trial, the evidence are required to be led by the complainant and / or their witnesses by stepping into the witness box and illustrating / demonstrating to what they have witnessed. The Complainant is to examine before the Court, himself, and all other witnesses, who are “witness” to the crime, which is alleged to have been committed by the accused named in the complaint. This examination of himself and other prosecution witnesses is called “Examination – in – Chief. 3.       Giving evidence of facts is critical to any trial, be it civil trial or criminal trial. And therefore, it becomes imperative to understand the dynamics of evidence in legal sens...
1 comment
Read more

FORM I [See Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3)]

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM I Under Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3) Encroach upon the Legislative Policy of the Parliament. FORM I [See Rules 5(1) and (2) and 17(3)] Domestic Incident Report under Sections 9(b) and 37(2)(c) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005) 1. Details of the complainant/aggrieved person     (1) Name of the complainant/aggrieved person:     (2) Age:     (3) Address of the shared household:     (4) Present Address:     (5) Phone Number, if any: 2. Details of Respondents: Sl. No. Name Relationship with the aggrieved person Address Telephone No., if any 3. Details of children, if any, of the aggrieved person:         (a) Number of Children:    ...
Post a Comment
Read more