Common Law

  It is said that Bail is Rule and Jail is an exception in Bail Cases. In a Society, which we do call it civilized, a Jail reduces a human being to animal. Jailing is akin to chaining human, where inherent human dignity is imminently lost.  A Justice, Judge or a Magistrate, being a reflection of superior human being, must deemed to stand for personal liberty, and can never argue for chaining a fellow human, unless it is vehemently shown that fellow human has acquired an Animal instinct of grave danger.  Therefore, in Bail matters, where limited issue is of personal liberty, a Judge indisputably stands for personal liberty. Therefore, Bail matters are inherently different from other Legal Cases. In other Legal Cases, the Judges, dispassionately, may be deciding rights of the parties. But in Bail matters, Judges stand for Personal liberty; and therefore in Bail Cases, Judges have to “argue” passionately, Impugning Prosecution, in favour of personal liberty, unless animal instinct

  1. Section 25(3) of Indian Contract Act, 1872. 2. Assignment of debt to the Debtor of the Debtor; and thereafter, the said Debtor of the Debtor may Claim set off.   Sandeep Jalan https://www.litigationplatform.com/  

In a Case before it, the Hon’ble Apex Court had the occasion to reiterate that: “Truth is the foundation of Justice. The entire judicial system has been created only to discern and find out the real truth. Judges at all levels have to seriously engage themselves in the journey of discovering the truth. That is their mandate, obligation and bounden duty”. (AIR 2012 SC 1727) Notwithstanding, holy pronouncements such as above, Parties to the litigation play tricks, invent false and fabricated Cause of action, makes evasive and ambiguous replies, distort and suppress facts and documents that are prejudicial to their Case. Nevertheless, the Law has answer to every trick. The Civil Procedure Code, that is, the CPC, provides a fascinating tool to discover the Truth of the matter. The CPC, under Order XI, provides for Discovery of “Truth” by production of documents and Discovery by putting up Interrogatories. Discovery means the act of revealing or disclosing any matter by a Defendant in his a

The Parties to the Contract may consider incorporating the following Arbitration Clause, in their Invoices / Purchase Orders / MoUs / any other Agreements / Contracts   Draft Arbitration Clause   Disputes or differences that may arise between the parties, arising under this transaction/ Contract, shall be resolved through the means of Arbitration, at “(Place / Mumbai”).   The Arbitration Clause may further provide for the following:   1.      The Arbitration shall be by Sole Arbitrator / by Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three Members. Each party shall appoint One Arbitrator and thereafter, these two Arbitrators shall appoint the third Arbitrator.   2.      The Arbitration shall be done by “Name of the Arbitral Institution”.   3.      Notice: All communication / correspondence / Notices shall be sent through Email. Any of the party, in addition to Email, may also communicate through Whatsapp. If there is any change in Email or Whatsapp number, the same shall be informed accord

    1.       Recently, I have come across a Case of my Cousin, where Landlord has filed a Section 8 Application under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, calling upon the Court to fix Standard Rent (essentially seeking huge increase in Rent), on the grounds that Suit premises is situate in prime commercial area and Rent has increased phenomenally in the immediate vicinity of Suit premises. 2.      And  I am told that Landlord is filing many such Applications against his tenants, and the  Small Causes Courts are entertaining such Applications, and are happily granting Reliefs to the Landlords; and Tenants are compelled to pay sky rocketing increased Rent, and that too, under the umbrella of Rent Control Legislation.   3.      And therefore, I dwelled upon the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and looked thru the history of Rent Control Legislations in India, and in particularly, the history of Rent Control Legislations in Maharashtra, or to say, of the Bombay Province.   4.     

The expression “Cause of action” perhaps is the most dynamic legal expression, embracing diverse aspects. Remarkably, given the judicial meaning assigned to the expression “Cause of action”, one may notice that the Cause of action is “complete” at the “accrual” of Cause of action. Therefore, the “fact” (overt act of commission or omission) that triggered the Cause of action, actually completes the “chain of events”; and proving of this solitary “important fact” may entitle Plaintiff / Petitioners the Judgment. Technically speaking, if this fact is proved, all other facts in the chain of events are deemed to have been proved.  It may be appreciated that Cause of action is a bundle of facts; and these bundle of facts are not isolated or independent facts, but are a chain of events.  The principle ingrained in section 114 of the Evidence Act, 1872, may be of greatest assistance at every stage in the dispensation of justice. I am convinced that while arguing any case before Court, the Coun