Skip to main content

Complaint under Consumer Act 1986 for deficiency in any goods or services

Please find updated content at:

https://www.litigationplatform.com/Judgment/Index/2f117f65-93d3-4550-8fdd-273d1a353309

https://www.litigationplatform.com/Judgment/Index/6c182613-361f-47b0-b036-a7b53f5a829c

https://www.litigationplatform.com/Judgment/Index/79f42029-67a5-4268-a3f2-84722e38a8ac

https://www.litigationplatform.com/Judgment/Index/192f5349-ef73-46b8-a385-098654fe64e1



Labels:

Comments

Unknown said…
A very useful post. Most of the builders in bangalore, do not adhere to the contract they entered into. does consumer court give redress?
If the builder takes money for maintenance and says he will use the interest money from corpus for maintenance then suddenly says, he has spent the corpus without giving any info or notice, is it a consumer court redress? thanks
June 7, 2010 at 2:49 AM
noufal said…
good it helped much in teaching my students.....
k m noufal
kmnoufal@gmail.com
asst. professor of commerce
govt. college kodanchery calicut kerala
October 12, 2010 at 2:39 AM
Rahulsutar said…
thank you for all that information,INDIA NEEDS PEOPLE LIKE YOU VERY MUCH..keep coming.
April 27, 2012 at 7:55 AM
SUNNY said…
Gone thru the entire post. i am a FMCG biscuit distributor in vadodara. company havent yet given the replacment money. so could i file it under consumer act 1986 to three-tier quasi-judicial machinery. my amount is approx 21 lacs so as per the blog i should go to State Commission. kindly suggest what to do.

thanks
April 27, 2013 at 2:20 AM
Sandeep Jalan said…
Pls see these two links and you may have the answer.

Unfolding "Commercial Purposes" as contemplated under the scheme of Consumer Protection Act of 1986
http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.in/2010/09/proposition-commercial-purposes-as.html

Consumer Protection
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/04/consumer-protection.html

April 27, 2013 at 9:04 AM
Unknown said…
Can some complaints be clubbed together to bring it before National Commission. For eg. 4 Independant claims of Rs. 25 lakhs equal to 1 crore. Can it be done.?
May 22, 2016 at 11:06 PM
Sandeep Jalan said…
Yes It is permitted. It is called joinder of causes of action. Pls refer section 2(1)(b)(iv) of consumer protection Act, 1986.
May 23, 2016 at 7:59 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Recall Jurisdiction of the Courts

What is Recall of Orders of the Court ? But first….what is expected from the Orders of the Court – a)       While giving due consideration to the submissions and evidences on record of the rival parties, to record a reasoned finding with respect to disputed question of fact or of law; b)       Employing cogent reasons about the conclusion reached in the order / judgment. c)       Passing of orders in accordance with law. d)      Principles of natural justice are reasonably observed in the judicial proceeding. And when the Orders suffers from any of the vices, it is challenged by way of Review, Appeal or in Revision, alleging the impugned Order, being infected with either of the grounds, i.e. – a)       That there is Error apparent on the face of the Record; b)       That there is Perversity in the impugned Order; c)...
8 comments
Read more

Form II under Rule 6 of Rules, 2006, framed under the impugned Act

Impugned Provision / other anomaly Breach of Section / Article FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the impugned Act Section 3 – Explanation II; Section 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the impugned Act. Principles of natural justice. FORM II [See Rule 6(1)] Application to the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)     To The Court of Magistrate .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Application under section ........................ of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005)            SHOWETH: That the application under section.................of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mumbai Capital Value Property Tax Judgment: A Rocket Science by Social Scientists; A Brief Analysis;

The subject of taxation is a “Rocket Science”. The constitution of Nine Judges Bench in the Mafatlal Industries Case, Reported in (1997) 5 SCC 536, running into more than 500 pages; the extremely contested Vodafone litigation; and the present Judgment of Bombay High Court running into 310 Pages, at least furnishes some justification to this statement of Rocket Science. There are umpteen Judgments, some of which are relied herein also (Para 147), that whilst dealing with challenge to Taxation laws, greater latitude is shown by Constitutional Courts, only for the reason that Taxation / Economic Legislation, by their very nature, are very complex. And hold on, the Regime of Property Tax based on Capital Value of the Property, was brought in force, on the recommendations of Tata Institute of “Social Sciences”. (Para 33 of the Judgment) Did these Social Scientist, nevertheless very respectable, would appreciate an Inch of what was discussed in 310 Pages of Judgment, even assuming t...
4 comments
Read more