Common Law

A section of media has published this. In his strongest statement ever, Union Home Minister P Chidambaram has warned Pakistan of retaliation in case of another Mumbai-like terror attack. He was addressing a gathering in Madurai.November 1, 2009 Senior BSF Officer killed in blast near Jammu. DIG O.P.Tanwar of the Border Security Officer was killed while two other personnel were injured in a blast triggered by militants near the Indo Pak border. Hindutan times- November 17, 2009 "However the blast was not like mumbai terror attack. So no retaliation required", I call it the Voice of Silence. ============================================================== Legal issues !! If you are facing any of these issues like (a) Recovery of Moneys (b) Immovable property disputes (c) grievances against Municipalities & Govts., including challenge to legitimacy of laws etc. (d) grievances against illegalities and highhandedness of Police like illegal arrests, refusal to regist

DAMAGES IN WRIT PROCEEDINGS This blog originated in the felt need for a EFFICIENT remedy that may be available to Citizens who are victims of gross misuse of powers and negligent acts and omissions of public authorities / public officials / police, resulting in loss of life or of property or of liberty of an individual. Do Citizens who are victim of irresponsible & reckless misbehavior of Police or of other Public officials, has any effective remedy against these government people ? ? ? The answer is astounding yes by Apex Court in good number of cases that came before it. When the constitutional and legal rights of a person are invaded with a mischievous or malicious infant, the court has jurisdiction to compensate the victim, by awarding suitable monetary compensation. Bhim Singh versus State of J & K, AIR 1986 SC 494. Apex court has used the Writ Jurisdiction to award compensation to victims of State wrongful acts. Usually a victim has to start from the lower court

Whereas manu sharma was found guilty of murdering model Jessica Lall and sentenced Life imprisonment; And whereas he was granted Parole as per the law; And whereas The Probation of offenders Act 1958 governs ‘Parole’; And whereas section 3 & 4 govern who can be granted Parole; Section 3 empowers court to release certain offenders after admonition (authoritative strict warning)- section says- where any person found guilty of offence of theft or offence of misappropriation of property, or any offence punishable for imprisonment upto two years….. may be granted Section 4 empowers court to release certain offenders of good conduct. The section begins with the categorical and unambiguous declaration that Parole cannot be considered for any person who is found guilty of having committed an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life…. And whereas manu sharma was found guilty of murdering model Jessica Lall and sentenced Life imprisonment. There is a Supreme Co

08.11.2009 Whereas a Patient dies after PM security blocks his way to Emergency; http://www.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/Patient-dies-after-PM-s-security-stops-him-PMO-orders-probe/472635/H1-Article1-472207.aspx I wish to say that Nations enforce UNCONSENTED supreme sacrifices on some of its Citizenry so that it can bring to the front ISSUES which have plagued it. However the death caused for the patient was ‘jammed’ by PM Security personnel, the result will be the same if the same patient was caught in ugly traffic jams of urban jungle. What we should be asking now: 1) Rational Security arrangement of VIPs that does not interfere with daily traffic; 2) No permission should be given for mass Rallies on roads; 3) The municipalities before declaring a road closed for repairs should ensure that the diversion of traffic on other road doesn’t create traffic jams. To whom should we ask? To one of the rightful owner of the problem !! The Courts. The High Court and th

Date: 03.11.2009 From: Sandeep Jalan, To: Shri K G Balakrishnan, the CJI, Shri Veerappa Moily, the Minister of Law & Justice Whereas Justice Dinakaran is accused of land grabbing with documentary evidences.... And whereas according to one SC Judgment no FIR can be registered against any Judge.... And yet FIR can be registered against Mr Dinakaran [not against Justice Dinakaran], for the offence of land grabbing was committed in an individual capacity..... And whereas the bar to register any FIR against any Judge is on the premise where any Judge has been accused of corruption in the due discharge of his duty as a Judge..... This is exactly what the SC has said in one ruling where no sanction is required to prosecute a public servant accused of amassing wealth disproportionate to his income, for amassing wealth is not an act which can be said “in the due discharge of his duty”.... Act of criminality is outcome of an individual thought process. Man accused of or