In various rulings of NCLT and NCLAT, while deciding Section 9 Petition under IBC, a view is taken that “Settlement Agreement” do not constitute “Operational debt” within the meaning of Section 5(21) of IBC. (The latest ruling appears to be of Trifigura India Pvt Ltd versus TDT Copper Ltd. NCLAT Order / Judgment dated 15.9.2022, passed in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 742 of 2020) With greatest respect to the Learned Members at the Bench, all such rulings are ex-facie erroneous. 1. Section 5(21) of IBC says Operational Debt "means a “Claim” and then sets out the class of debts that are considered as “Operational debts”. What is covered are (1) claims in respect of the provision of goods or services (2) claims in respect of Employment and (3) A debt in respect of the payment of dues arising under any law payable to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority. 2. Now the Claim is defined u/s 3(6) of IBC. “Claim” means (a)